[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: KAT5 Scart and IR Distribution
Hi Stuart / Keith
I made a 2x2 splitter meaning 2 groups of 2 leds in series and the 2 groups
are wired in parallel....
I also put a 100 ohm resistor in series with the signal to both groups....
The drive current wasnt enough to see any activity on a red led inserted
into the splitter but i had a emitter plugged in and located adjacent a
usbuirt and it responded....Have tried lowering the series resistor but the
drive current doesnt appear to go any more than .2mA....
Keith i assume you have a current limiting resistor in series with the ir
out ??
Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Whyte" <groups@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 10:18 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] KAT5 Scart and IR Distribution
> Hi Keith,
>
> 1) Thanks for the info. This has sorted it nicely.
>
> 2) Is there an "optimum" that I should try? For what
reasons will I need
> to change up or down?? Also I think this might be what Frank is
looking
> into. Frank??
>
> Cheers
>
> Stuart
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx on behalf of Keith Doxey
> Sent: Sun 01/01/2006 21:17
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] KAT5 Scart and IR Distribution
>
>
>
> Hi Stuart
>
>> Subject: [ukha_d] KAT5 Scart and IR Distribution
>>
>> 2 questions for the price of 1 here - probably directed to Keith
and
>> Frank.
>>
>> 1) My old setup was sky+ to KAT5 TX via SCART then KAT5 RX to TV.
>> In this config, SKY+ would "seize" control of the TV
whenever it was
>> switched on, without the need for me to press AV. IF I removed
the
>> Sky+ scart, TV would revet back to DVB. Ive now put an AV switch
in
>> line that uses S-Video. So (no surprises), I have to now press AV
to
>> access the switcher everytime the TV is switched on. This is not
>> having a very high WAF at the moment, so need some sort of
>> resoulution. I understand WHY this is happening, but not how to
fix
>> it. Is there anything that can be done to the RX for example to
make
>> it think there is a Scart "seize" signal on its other
end??
>>
>
> Two ways of doing this.
>
> 1. Program a universal remote control for a "Sony Laserdisk
Player" and
> than
> you can manually force the KAT5 output as follows
>
> 0 = Off
> 1 = Full Screen 4:3 (+12V)
> 2 = Wide Screen 16:9 (+5V)
> 3 = Follow Pin at KAT5 transmitter (Default after power up)
>
> 2. Use the Pin8 signals from the source equipment. Take each Pin 8
from
> the
> sources and connect them via diodes to Pin8 of the KAT5 TX SCART
>
> eg
>
> Device Diode KAT5
>
> Sat Pin 8------>-----
> DVD Pin 8------>---------- KAT5 TX Pin8
> ??? Pin 8------>-----
>
> The drawback with method 2 is that any of the devices will force the
TV to
> switch if its Pin8 is active. Any device signalling Fullscreen will
> override
> any device that is signalling Widescreen.
>
>
>> 2) Continuing with the above config, I have an rf2link
>> (http://www.pacelink.co.uk/rf2link.htm)
connected between the KAT 5
>> and Sky+. With the addition of the switched, I would now like to
add
>> 2 IR emmiters for the DVD and switcher. Im not interested in
zoning
>> or anything like that, just to have the IR out of the KAT5 TX have
3
>> outputs. What would I need to accomplish this, as I think a
complete
>> FiRM setup would be an overkill. Frank, would just a splitter do
the
>> job??
>>
>
> You could try a simple resistive splitter. Take the output from KAT5
and
> feed each emitter and the RF2link via individual resistors. Try 270R
as a
> starting point and increase or decrease as required. I wouldnt drop
below
> 100R though.
>
> If you need any more info give me a call. You have the number :)
>
> Regards
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
> privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal
attention of
> the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error,
> please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
> disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the
> contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have
> taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this
> email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising
from
> the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for
the
> content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on
the
> basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments,
unless
> that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email
> contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to
treat.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|