Re: Idratek - Serious Contender?

["Frank Mc Alinden" <frankmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

'looks OK to me - a lot better than Clipsal, anyway

Your not serious here ????.........

Clipsal,s Saturn and DLT,s .....theres nothing that i have seen that looks
anywhere near as nice ....

Frank


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hunter" <cjhunter@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Idratek - Serious Contender?


> 'must say, I don't understand people's reservations about the look of
> Idratek ... 'looks OK to me - a lot better than Clipsal, anyway, and
> most of the others , too ...
>
> OTOH, I am also having trouble with the idea of having HA whilst
> reatining all the usual switches etc ... is it belts & braces, or
just a
> lack of confidence ?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> Steve Edwards wrote:
>
>> Might I suggest a controversial solution to all the CBUS woes...
>>
>> Idratek have released their new website, while it's not everything
we
>> hoped (the lack of a shop is a disappointment) the sheer number of
>> modules now is very impressive.
>>
>> More news here:
>>
>> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article1662.html
>>
>> Remember, this is a company that came along to ukha2004, gave a
demo,
>> and listened to what we had to say, they added XPL support to
their
>> product as an example...
>>
>> They still have the big issue of the look of the switches, which
>> unfortunately haven't been changed, but maybe if something a large
as
>> the ukha community got interested we could persuade a little bit
of
>> development there.
>>
>> Lets face it, the majority of X10 modules are not exactly pretty
either.
>>
>> I'm putting on my fireproof jacket now, let me know what you
think.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>