The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Over 100 New European Products at Z-Wave Alliance Summit


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] XP file copy utility?


  • Subject: RE: [OT] XP file copy utility?
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:03:11 +0100

Thanks - I've now found a util called Synchromat which seems quite
good - w=
orking away as I type...

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Kim Wall
> Sent: 29 August 2006 17:56
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] XP file copy utility?
>=20
> Paul Gale wrote:
> > I=92m looking for a third party file copy utility for XP that
will only
> > replaces files that don=92t exist or are newer/bigger filesizes.
XP=92s
> > inbuilt copy util is rubbish!
>=20
> > Any recommendations?
>=20
> I believe rsync will run on windows under cygwin.  Google finds:
>=20
> http://optics.ph.unimelb.edu.au/help/rsync/rsync_pc1.html
>=20
> which looks promising.
>=20
> rsync's a bit of a Swiss-army-knife for this sort of thing, and well
> worth getting your head round the various parameters - most notably,
it
> can do 'local' copies as well as using the rsync protocol over the
> network (I assume you've got the old machine mounted using the usual
> windows filesharing, so no need to complicate things).
>=20
> I use it extensively for backups; nightly to a dedicated disk in the
> server, and monthly to a USB2 removable drive.  Much faster than doing
a
> straight copy.
>=20
>=20
> Kim.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.