RE: X10 Question

["Jonathan Hall" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Peter,



It is this one http://www.espuk.com/intro_infinite.htm
 I got it from
www.tlc-direct.co.uk <http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/> 
as they were the
cheapest I could find.  Comfort seemed to be a bit OTT for what I wanted to
start with as I'd decided not to put any HA into our current house but
would
in the next.



The x10 module is a daughter board that plugs in, alone with a phone
dialler, which I have, and a GSM dialler, which I don't.  I don't have the
x10 module yet either as I hadn't plan to go down that route initially but
I
like the idea of being to activate the lights if the alarm activates.
Having emailed the tech people at the company about the x10 module they say
that the next version of the firmware will be able to switch on the lights
but they don't have it in yet. I've asked them for some info techy info
today but not had a response yet.  When I do I'll post what I find out.



Like you I'm not going wireless, my cousin is a sparkie, who does alarms,
and he said as I could run wires in, I'm renovating the house so I took it
back to the shell, to do that.  He said the batteries go flat in the
sensors
and unless you keep on top of it you might not know and then there a comms
issues. I tried wireless LAN in my house and decided to CAT 5 the place.



Cheers

Jonathan



_____

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
White, Peter
Sent: 21 August 2006 12:09
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] X10 Question



What alarm is it? I've not been able to find any alarm that supports X10,
apart from a Prosys (currently installed, and it's bloody awful to
configure) and a wireless one whose name escapes me, but it was something
to
do with BT. We're now ripping out the alarm and replacing it with something
a little more standard, and just having very basic X10 via relays and
powerflash modules. As I've got the wires I'd rather use them rather than
going wireless.

Pete

_____

From: Marcus Warrington [mailto:marcus.warrington@
<mailto:marcus.warrington%40mis-es.com>
mis-es.com]
Sent: 21 August 2006 11:50
To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
com
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] X10 Question

Jonathan,

The LD11's (+ 99% of all modules available in the UK) do *not* support
status response. This means that it is impossible for the alarm panel to
simply ask the modules if the light is currently on or off. In your
particular case I don't think it matters because the Alarm panel will
not be toggling the light like the light switches do, it will be issuing
an explicit X10 command "Light ON". This means if the light is
currently
off it will turn on but if already on it will remain on i.e. ignore the
command

In fact if you use an LD11 (which supports extended codes) and your
alarm panel supports extended X10 commands, then you could actually
issue a "Direct To 100%" command which would then mean that if
the light
was already on but dimmed it would brighten to 100% instead of remaining
dimmed.

Marcus

____________-_________-_________-__

From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
-com
[mailto:ukha_d@yahoogroups. <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
-com] On
Behalf
Of Jonathan Hall
Sent: 21 August 2006 11:21
To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
-com
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] X10 Question

Thanks for you replies on this. If I use something like the LD11 from
Lets
Automate, as Marcus suggested, and wired as Kevin said with the switches
in
parallel. I see that that pushing any momentary switch will toggle the
state
of the lights.

As I want the alarm to switch on the lights if an event is triggered, is
there a way to leave the lights on if they are already? Or is that
really
down to the level of intelligence in the alarm to check the status of
the
lights? If it is just acting as another switch then it would just toggle
from the current state and turn the lights off if they were on. Not the
idea I had in mind, I like to see where I'm running when I'm in blind
panic
:-).

Cheers
Jonathan

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]