The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: =?us-ascii?Q?RE:_=5Bukha=5Fd=5D_Re:_ARRGHH_I_thought_this_was_supose?= =?us-ascii?Q?d_to_be_simple!?=


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Pocket Camera - Son P200 etc?



Hi Simon

Nice Pics ...... Is that  the Antrim coast ?? Really nice scenery ....

Frank


----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon McCaughey" <simonmcc@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Pocket Camera - Son P200 etc?


> Mark
>
> I think my camera is maybe in a different class (ie a lower one) but I
> really love it, and would heartily recommend it. It's only 4
> megapixel. The Konica-minolta dimage g400.
>
> http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/dimage_g400.html
>
> There may be a newer version available, I'm not sure. Very fast
> startup (as good as instant), fast picture to picture time, excellent
> battery life and a good size. Performs best outdoors, but then thats
> possibly an issue with all compacts.
>
> I was at a wedding last Thursday, and managed to snap 390 shots, most
> of which I'm very pleased with.
>
> If you want to see some samples (not the wedding, other shots) check
> out http://www.mccaughey.co.uk/gallery/MussendenWalk
some cool shots.
>
> HTH
>
> Simon
>
>
> On 12/04/06, Mark McCall <lists@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Looking for a "pocketable" camera for the Mrs.
>>
>> Had a good play with the Sony P200 over the weekend, and it seems
ideal.
>> Anything else I should be looking at?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> M.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.