RE: Re: Remote camera

["Ward, David" <DAvid.Ward@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Same experience here

The camera stability can be improved a little by running it from a
regulated
supply, tuning is helped by replacing the pot with a multiturn version. 
Not
brilliant , but okay for the money.

Dave



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Patrick Lidstone [mailto:patrick@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: 19 September 2005 13:56
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Remote camera
>
>
>--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Mark McCall" <lists@a...>
wrote:
>> Lots of these around..(watch out for high postage from HK etc,
still
>cheap
>> though).
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/84byu
>>
>> Receiver will feed straight into your GeoVision.
>>
>> As has already been suggested, something like a motorcycle
battery,
>or a set
>> of nicads for an RC car etc might do on the power front.
>>
>
>My experience of these cameras wasn't great - the frequency tended to
>dift with voltage drops, and required retuning of the receiver every
>few minutes. I wonder if they might not also be affected by changes in
>temperature? It could just be that I had a duff one I guess...
>
>Patrick
>
>
>
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>--------------------~-->
>We'll help your hive really thrive (healthy tips for the whole family).
>http://us.click.yahoo.com/sjgFUD/0lQLAA/a8ILAA/IBOolB/TM
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-----~->
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>