[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Kat5 vs Cat5
- Subject: RE: Kat5 vs Cat5
- From: "Des Gibbons" <des@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:14:55 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Kevin Hawkins
> Sent: 28 October 2005 17:15
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Kat5 vs Cat5
>
> Ian Oliver wrote:
>
> >In article <001101c5dad7$600a9fe0$0200a8c0@xxxxxxx>,
> Mark McCall wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Still can't see the tech specs anywhere though. As it
> remotely powers
> >>the other end (which must need a pair?) and does IR I can't
> see how it
> >>would be able to do S-Video plus stereo as KAT5 does.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I've had a response. It's composite only, but an RGB version
> is under
> >development. They seemed interested/puzzled that someone
> would want s-video.
> >
> >
> >
> They (Chris) must be doubly puzzled by now then ;-) At
> least they know
> there's a couple of people who think composite's no use at all.
Make that 3 :)
Cheers, Des.
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|