RE: Kat5 vs Cat5

["John Risby" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

has anyone tried either of these products?

http://www.cyberselect.co.uk/range/412

=A343.90 for a pair without audio, =A3102.93 with stereo.

I have audio wired to the kitchen already and only really need video and
IR (these don't do IR so I'll probably use a xantech receiver.)

thanks

john

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx]=20
> On Behalf Of Kevin Hawkins
> Sent: 28 October 2005 17:15
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Kat5 vs Cat5
>=20
>=20
> Ian Oliver wrote:
>=20
> >In article <001101c5dad7$600a9fe0$0200a8c0@xxxxxxx>,=20
> Mark McCall=20
> >wrote:
> >=20=20
> >
> >>Still can't see the tech specs anywhere though.  As it=20
> remotely powers=20
> >>the other end (which must need a pair?) and does IR I can't=20
> see how it=20
> >>would be able to do S-Video plus stereo as KAT5 does.
> >>=20=20=20=20
> >>
> >
> >I've had a response. It's composite only, but an RGB version is
under
> >development.  They seemed interested/puzzled that someone=20
> would want s-video.
> >
> >=20=20
> >
> They (Chris) must be doubly puzzled by now then ;-)   At=20
> least they know=20
> there's a couple of people who think composite's no use at all.
>=20
> Kevin
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor=20
> --------------------~-->=20
> We'll help your hive really thrive (healthy tips for the=20
> whole family).=20
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/sjgFUD/0lQLAA/a8ILAA>
/IBOolB/TM
>=20
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------~->=20
>=20
>=20=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/150 - Release=20
> Date: 27/10/2005
>=20=20
>=20

--=20
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/150 - Release Date:
27/10/2005
=20