The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: LCD TV



The Samsungs are getting very favourable reviews and comments on avforums,
especially now since they fixed the tearing issue with a firmware update,
though supply may be a problem at the moment. I can't decided whether to
ge=
t
a 26" or 32".
=20
I just returned a Haier 30" LCD from ebuyer that was =A3550, it was
great a=
s a
monitor and for MCE (freeview), though couldn't handle progressive scan
fro=
m
my Linn Unidisk. Good value for money and not bad design either.
=20
Remember you have the ability to return items bought online under distance
selling rules.
=20
Marchino

________________________________

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Stuart Worrall
Sent: 02 October 2005 12:24
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] LCD TV


Ive just bought the 26" version of the Samsung and it is a very good
set.
Comes well recommended.

stu=20

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Jim Noble
Sent: 02 October 2005 12:10
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] LCD TV

Tim Fletcher wrote:

> I have just, ahem, "earned" some free money and so was
thinking about=20
> spending a bit of it on an LCD TV.  32" max and nothing too
exotic as=20
> it will be in the firing line for the childrens play and so might
meet=20
> a sticky end - Acer are offering this http://tinyurl.com/cu7vu for sub=20
> =A3800 - looks great - anyone seen one in the flesh, or know where
one=20
> might be oggled?  Other recommendations?
>

I've been looking at 26" ones myself, but the Samsung 32"
LE32R41BD keeps
cropping up as a recommendation. Similar price to the Acer I believe...

Jim



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.