The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] Electronics Circuit Help


  • Subject: RE: [OT] Electronics Circuit Help
  • From: "Dean Smith" <dean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:09:47 -0000

"Or is it one of those things that the protocol allows for but doesn't
get
sent by BT?"

Yes it is (unfortunately!)


-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Kim Wall
Sent: 21 November 2005 19:39
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Electronics Circuit Help


Martyn Wendon wrote:
> Yes, by connecting the CID units after the call-sign (distinctive
ring)
> boxes, I will then know which number has been called by which CID unit
> provides the CID data.  The call-sign boxes do pass through the CID
data
> (I've tried them).

I might be misremembering, but doesn't the raw CID data (as you'd get
from a hacked CD50) give the called as well as calling number?  Or is it
one of those things that the protocol allows for but doesn't get sent by
BT?


Kim.






----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a..  Visit your group "ukha_d" on the web.

b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx

c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.