Re: Touchscreen Remote - Pronto or PocketPC?

["Ben McCormack" <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul

Too complicated and too much that could go wrong.

As the moment I am looking at the New Dell x50v PDA with WiFi,=20
Bluetooth and CF slot. I can pick one up in the US for about =A3200!!

Ben

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Paul Gale" <groups@s...> wrote:
> I have used netremote as well - maybe another option for doing it=20
wirelessly if you have something like Homevision and an HA PC???
>=20
> Paul.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yahoo Lists [mailto:ukha@r...]=20
> Sent: 25 February 2005 10:59
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Touchscreen Remote - Pronto or PocketPC?
>=20
>=20
> I have an HP iPaq 5555 and use a program from PDAwin:
>=20
> http://www.pdawin.com/tvremote.html
>=20
> This software is pretty good - it allows you to load pronto CCF=20
files into so you can use the pronto edit software to create you=20
layouts.
>=20
> I believe Dell as well as HP make Pocket PC devices with consumer=20
IR in them (my iPaq certainly has it). I guess some of the other=20
manufacturers like Toshiba are also jumping on the bandwagon.
>=20
> Rob
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben McCormack [mailto:ben@t...]=20
> Posted At: 25 February 2005 10:45
> Posted To: Yahoo Lists
> Conversation: [ukha_d] Touchscreen Remote - Pronto or PocketPC?
> Subject: [ukha_d] Touchscreen Remote - Pronto or PocketPC?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Hi All
>=20
> I have got a bit of a dilemma.
>=20
> I have got an original Pronto that we use downstairs and I have=20
very=20
> happy with it. Now we want another one for upstairs.
>=20
> So I went off and found the new Pronto RU950 at =A3200. So I
thought=20
> great I can get that.
>=20
> Then I started thinking about the Pocket PC based remote solutions.=20
> Surely for around =A3200-=A3250 I could get a remote and a PocketPC
in=20
> one?
>=20
> So what are my options for PocketPC based solution?
>=20
> So far I have only found this - http://www.ultramote.com/index.php
>=20
> Are there others?
>=20
> and are they as good as a Pronot based solution?
>=20
> Cheers
>=20
> ben
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links