[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: Budget network attached storage?
- Subject: RE: Re: Budget network attached storage?
- From: "Ward, David" <DAvid.Ward@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:56:48 +0100
Thanks Alex,
That's what I suspected
I think I'll set up another box as NAS, and I see no reason why this
couldn't also be the HA server and if I use reverse proxy I guess it could
also serve secure Web pages for control purposes...
Dave
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Monaghan [mailto:ha@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: 30 August 2005 15:44
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Budget network attached storage?
>
>
>
>I'd not suggest using your firewall for anything other than a
>firewall :)
>
>There's no technical reason why you shouldn't install SAMBA on the box
>(after all, it's just a Linux distribution), I'd not be
>comfortable with my
>data sitting on the external line of defence to my network though.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> does anyone run a combined Linux NAS & Firewall/Router ?
>>
>> I run Smoothwall (I have limited Linux experience) and
>> combining the NAS into the router machine would save space
>> and power consumption?
>>
>> I guess seperate boxes is more secure though ?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
>
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>--------------------~-->
>We'll help your hive really thrive (healthy tips for the whole family).
>http://us.click.yahoo.com/sjgFUD/0lQLAA/a8ILAA/IBOolB/TM
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-----~->
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|