[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: SATA vs EIDE Hard drives for a file server
- Subject: RE: Re: SATA vs EIDE Hard drives for a file
server
- From: "christopher purves" <CHRIS_PURVES@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:37:47 +0000
Jumping in - there was an excellent article I think on toms hardware about
doing raid 5 with software (win xp). He also has loads of articles about
raid with pci raid cards.
I have always useds pci card based solutions. Its trivial to configure
these- attach drives to the card (this is where the small sata cables
help),
select drives to use in raid card bios, select raid mode (say 5) run
fromat/partition command - takes hours usually. You are done.
If you are buying a card and have some money go for 3-ware. Failing that
promise. Failiing that any old crap.
Chris
>From: "noel_pilot" <HA@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: [ukha_d] Re: SATA vs EIDE Hard drives for a file server
>Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:59:21 -0000
>
>Hi there,
>thanks for your reply, could you point me towards a good
>explanation/how to for Raid 5 so's I can read up a bit and learn a bit
>about the pros and cons and impacts etc etc
>Thanks a lot,
>Noel
>
>--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, Gerry Duprey <gerry@c...> wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > SATA would be my suggestion.
> >
> > The cables are smaller/thinner making it easier to work in your
case
>and
> > allowing more airflow around things. SATA interfaces are faster
>than IDE
> > (though they are both a bit limited by the drive hardware).
> >
> > I just recently (well, 6 months ago) built a 2TB video
server/HTPC
>using 8
> > 300GB SATA drives. I am using RAID-5 on them because while I
could
>re-rip
> > my 230+ DVDs on it -- who wants to? It took a month of evenings
to
>do it.
> >
> > The drives have performed flawlessly. This was my first SATA
usage (I
> > usually use SCSI for RAID, but the SCSI drives either weren't
this
>large or
> > were ungodly expensive). Since then I've configured or helped
folks
> > configure a number of systems using SATA and haven't run into any
>problems yet.
> >
> > And on the RAID issue, it really isn't that difficult or problem
>prone. If
> > you value your time at something over $30/hour, it may really
start to
> > suggest a way to protect the data (RAID-5, while not great for
>databases, is
> > great for media (video, music, pictures) and allows the least
amount of
> > capacity loss to overhead.
> >
> > Gerry
> >
> > noel_pilot wrote:
> > > I don't intend to use Raid to be honest, no real need for it
and the
> > > complexity and troubles it seems to bring. All data small
enough will
> > > be backed up, e.g. photos and music and other documents
whilst movies
> > > will be on DVD discs so can be re-ripped if required.
> > >
> > > So.....opinions on IDE vx SATA???
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "christopher purves"
> > > <CHRIS_PURVES@M...> wrote:
> > > > I think the question for raid is sata vs scsi really.
All our
> > > machines at
> > > > work still use scsi for reliability. We would expect a
5tb stack
> > > with scsi
> > > > disks to lose 1 disk per year on average. I imagine
with ata (PATA
> > > or SATA)
> > > > failures are much more frequent.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: "noel_pilot" <HA@a...>
> > > > >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > >To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > >Subject: [ukha_d] SATA vs EIDE Hard drives for a
file server
> > > > >Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:17:50 -0000
> > > > >
> > > > >Hey all,
> > > > >Looking to build my first proper file server
similar to the one in
> > > > >Marks guide.
> > > > >Hard drives are coming via a friend from the
states so very nice
> > > > >prices e.g. $145 for 320Gb either SATA or EIDE.
(approx £79!!)
> > > > >
> > > > >Opinions on the benefits or drawbacks of either
method.
> > > > >I know SATA has hot swappability but I dont seem
to have seen
>as many
> > > > >caddies available.
> > > > >Probably looking eventually at around 6 to 8
drives for around
>2Tb!
> > > > >Thanks all,
> > > > >Noel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SPONSORED LINKS
> > > Home repair improvement
> > >
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Home+repair+improvement&w1=Home+repair+improvement&w2=Computer+stuff&w3=High&w4=Improvement&c=4&s=76&.sig=TcERUCDPQcJLbg9mtvQGJQ>
>
> > > Computer stuff
> > >
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Computer+stuff&w1=Home+repair+improvement&w2=Computer+stuff&w3=High&w4=Improvement&c=4&s=76&.sig=plS9-eUUfaBXyLVFT87AJg>
>
> > > High
> > >
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=High&w1=Home+repair+improvement&w2=Computer+stuff&w3=High&w4=Improvement&c=4&s=76&.sig=b5d547gPx7eFWNGqXQCl7A>
>
> > >
> > > Improvement
> > >
><http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Improvement&w1=Home+repair+improvement&w2=Computer+stuff&w3=High&w4=Improvement&c=4&s=76&.sig=O6pw_oratTOwep2G_91fIQ>
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > * Visit your group "ukha_d
><http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukha_d>"
> > > on the web.
> > >
> > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > <mailto:ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx?subject=Unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
> > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> > >
> > >
> > >
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Gerry Duprey
> > Ann Arbor, MI 48103
> > http://www.cdp1802.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|