The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Remote IO


  • Subject: RE: Remote IO
  • From: "Nigel Giddings" <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:15:53 +0100


Simon,

I can recomend the VIOM as well. I have been using it for some months now
w=
ith Homeseer. Although as Kevin says it can be programmed to work
standalon=
e as well. Very reliable piece of kit.

Photo of my unit with two relay boards, I will have two VIOMs when I get
th=
e second one mounted...

http://photos.corbenic.co.uk/photos/photo_180.html

At the moment using it for Mag Locks and door contacts but intend to use
if=
for external scene lighting (SON lamps) as well.

Nigel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Hawkins [mailto:lists@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 24 October 2004 16:46
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Remote IO



Hi Simon,

If you are happy with a serial control link then take a look at a=20
product from Phaedrus called the VIOM this is a very capable input=20
output device with 16 inputs, 16 outputs and 8 timers plus an expansion=20
relay board option.  It has some inbuilt 'smarts' too to handle local=20
actions.  Cost is =A342 +Vat  (=A315 for the relay board)

http://www.phaedrusltd.co.uk/system/index.html

Very popular in the UKHA community

Kevin




Simon McCaughey wrote:

>I'm looking for a solution for remote control / monitoring of hardware
in =
my house, really what I want is relay outputs, and inputs to feed from the
=
house alarm etc...
>
>I'm interested in either a PC based solution, or a standalone hardware,
an=
d as always cost is a major factor :)
>
>
>=20=20
>





=20

UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.