RE: Total internal VOIP?

["UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

Mitel stuff is propriatory - if you have 30k to spend then go ahead...

If you really want to use a voip/dect solution without the analog cards
then take a look at

http://www.kirktelecom.com

more specifically http://www.kirktelecom.com/company/suk207.asp
although unless you happen
to have Cisco Call Manager* you'd be using h.323. These boxes have

Up to 25 users (2.4 GHz)
Up to 9 simultaneous conversations (2.4 GHz)

You can also add repeaters to increate their range.. in this situation you
acutally only have 1 dect->voip
access point, but the repeaters allow you to roam about in their range. see
http://www.kirktelecom.com/company/suk208.asp

If you are really loaded look at the 1500 ip solution

http://www.kirktelecom.com/company/suk177.asp

* If you have this then you have $$$$$ so call your cicso account manager
:D


ok, now I'm beginning to sound like a reseller, which I'm not, so I'll shut
up..

HTH

Andy


On 11/10/2004 at 12:10 Jon Whiten wrote:

>I now understand you a little better.
>
>I have only seen devices that present 2 VOIP circuits to the DECT base
>station, and I found that this was a little too limiting for me.  I did
>find
>a Mitel solution ( http://www.mitel.com/resources/data_IP_Dect_Data_P8.pdf
>)
>that allows up to 8 VoIP paths but this also seemed to need another
central
>Mitel Box.
>
>
>Regards
>
>Jon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Richard Malcolm-Smith [mailto:rich@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 11:38 AM
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Total internal VOIP?
>
>
>
>
>Jon Whiten wrote:
>
>> Do you mean something like this
>> http://www.voiptalk.org/products/product_info.php?products_id=135
?
>
>no, thats wifi - a protocol never designed for voice usage patterns,
Look
>at
>the awefull standby times for an example. If you talked for 2 hours,
you
>would only then have about 12 hours of standby left. Hardly exciting,
and
>the handset is somewhat large.
>
>Wifi also seems to have a much shorter range then dect, Sure, you can
>possibly knock the IP phone back to 1 meg like the cisco ones do (If I
>recall right) - but that will make the AP useless for everyone else to
use.
>
>Dect is designed for cordless phones, it has much better standby times,
and
>theres no QOS to worry about with others using the same AP making your
>packetloss go to shit. While there are QOS standards on the way, I
think
>all
>your wireless devices will have to support it.
>
>I want to locate something that will have ethernet on one end, and an
>antenna on the other, perhaps a web interface to allow me to associate
>handsets with it, and then it, and any others that I configure the same
>will
>work together to make each dect handset appear as an independant SIP
phone
>to the asterisk box, Im sure there would be a little more to it then
that,
>but you get the idea.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>