The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: {OTish} Power consumption



I stuck a standard PC on my HAWK Energy monitor to see what current it
actually draws (we needed to quanitify it for an office energy survey).
Even
on startup it was drawing 150w max and on idle somewhere around 90w. So
fear
not, BUT stick a SCSI HD in it (10k or faster) and u can watch that power
consumption go up by 20-30w - All of that heat has to come from somewhere.
Also some of the new high end graphics cards  pull quite a bit of power too

Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mal Lansell" <mlansell@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] {OTish} Power consumption


> Matthew Miles wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have never had a problem with leaving my PC's on 24/7 (the HA
> > system NEVER gets turned off [except for maintainance]). 
However, I
> > was wondering how much this impacts on my leccy bill... I was
> > horrified to find that 100W of power costs 15.6p/hr!  That means
a
> > 400W powerpack costs £14 a day to run!  PLEEEASE tell me that
this is
> > wrong! That was for 1 PC and I run at least 4 at all times
(including
> > some Compaq SCSI enclosures with 750W powerpacks!)
> >
> > Can anyone clarify?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Matt
>
> That is wrong.  Electricity is sold by the kW hour, (1000W/hr) so
you're
> probably out by 10 times to start with.  Where did the figure of 15.6p
come
> from?  5p would be more likely.
>
> That 400W supply at 5p/kW hour would cost 48p per day, assuming you
don't
> have any cheap rate supplies, and even then only if it was running at
full
> load (unlikely).
>
> Mal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>





UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.