The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Best place for Russound kit?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 1-wire on structured cableing


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: 1-wire on structured cableing
  • From: "Jon Whiten" <jon@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:23:20 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@yahoogroups.com; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

If I were to do this I would makes sure that there was a 100 Ohm resistor
in
series with each of the individual data line branches on the 1-wire
network.
This apparently makes multi-drop networks more resilient.


Regards

Jon Whiten
http://www.whiten.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Grimshaw [mailto:stuart@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:56 PM
To: ukha_d@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ukha_d] 1-wire on structured cableing

Ayone using their structured cableing with 1-wire devices attached to the
end of runs?

I tried back at my old gaff by crimping a DS1820 into a RJ45 plug and
putting that into the patch panel in the loft. It seemed to work OK.

My plan was to assign some ports on the panel to be 1-wire only and tie
each
of the pins on the ports in question together. That way each cable plugged
into the panel would be in paralell and I could just pick a pair and add
the
1-wire device to it.

I nevver got around to testing it at any great length, has anyone done
anything similar?

--
-S



UK Home Automation Meet 2004 - BOOK NOW!
http://www.ukha2004.com

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@yahoogroups.com


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.