The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: New Regs to kill DIY HA?




Does that mean that if I put in a whole new lighting circuit, as long as it
runs back to an exisiting or certified fused spur, I'm legal? Or even a few
sockets, subject to the total 13A max?

What about external wiring - if it comes from an existing or certified
fused RCD spur box, is it exempt?

Would it make a difference if it was connected through a plugtop?

Pete

BTW I'm the qualified electrician's worst nightmare. In my time I've
rewired a few houses, replumbed as well including gas plumbing. I regard
myself as competent, even if I don't qualify in the meaning of part P.

What I would like is a DIY self certification course and qualification. I
am certified to pack skydiver's reserve parachutes, and that requires
considerable care and knowledge of current information, I assure you, so I
don't see that learning and staying current with wiring regs is too onerous
a task. I can't be the only person in this position.

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 20/12/2004 at 18:42 David Buckley wrote:

>--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, Stuart Grimshaw <stuart.grimshaw@g...>
>wrote:
>
>> I also plan to add a relay to allow computer control of the
central
>> heating, with most boilers this is again fairly trivial, but will
>> require inspection so I doubt I'll do it now (or if I do, just say
it
>> was done this year.
>
>
>I'd have thought yopur gubbins would be after the fused spur unit, and
>thus would not be classed as an appliance, rather than fixed wiring.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>






UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.