The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] Ebay Diddle? New Twist ?


  • Subject: RE: [OT] Ebay Diddle? New Twist ?
  • From: "Marc Fuller" <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:29:53 -0000


I've been (or my auction has) a recent victim of something very similar. I
=
had an auction that ran for a high price item. The auction ended, I got
pai=
d, the person was happy with the item. A few days later, I received an
emai=
l from one of the other people that bidded on my auction, asking a
question=
about the item. It turns out that he received what looked like a legitimat=
e ebay email, offering him a second chance. He had already responded to
the=
SCO (Second Chance Offer) and had a reply from me (that's the fake me).
=20
Luckily for him, he wanted to ask me a question first, and sent it to me
(t=
he real me) and I responded telling him the auction had ended etc. He was
a=
ll ready to pay. Close one for him.
=20
So, be warned.. SCO's can easily be forged.
=20
Regards
=20
Marc
=20
=20

________________________________

From: mouserdrip15 [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Mon 13/12/2004 22:55
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Ebay Diddle?





Hi

Over the weekend I bid on an item. It had a starting price of =A3350,
there we no bidders at all untill I bid in the last 10 mins. Then
immediately I was continuosly outbid by a zero rated new bidder until
I lost the item.
5 mins after the auction ended I got a second chance offer from the
seller saying the zero rated bidder was a fraud....!
This seems very much like a underhanded seller forcing his price up?
Or am I being parranoid?

Rob









UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.