The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home

Group Home

Search Archive
Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.

Subject: Re: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.
From: Wayne <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:36:23 +0100
References: <AIEHJPFBKAHINBCCEOFIKEGAEDAA.dean@rolec.net> <004201c4216d$9d6db0e0$0c100e0a@ascentium.co.uk>

Mark Harrison (Yahoo!) wrote:

>- I do not say this because ANY web server is bug-free and exploit-free
- I
>can only think of one piece of code that I _trust_ to be bug-free, and
>that's the core from the Inmos T8000. [bonus points to anyone who can
tell
>me WHY I make that claim.]
>
>
>
>
This isnt the same 'Mark Harrison' that wrote this google nugget?
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/sussex/2003-May/002916.html

and it has somthing to do with the way Inmos checked out  the
hardware/compiler/software thoroughly.

:)

Wayne.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.
  - From: Mark Harrison $Yahoo!$

References:
- RE: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.
  - From: Dean Barrett
- Re: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.
  - From: Mark Harrison $Yahoo!$

Prev by Message: Re: Re: cat5e stp or utp?
Next by Message: Re: Re: cat5e stp or utp?
Previous by thread: Re: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.
Next by thread: Re: Re: [OT] - HELP PLEASE we've been hacked.
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.