The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: MV1000 users


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: MV1000 users
  • From: "Dean Barrett" <dean@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:41:25 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I like the idea of trying to make it go faster :)

I certainly couldnt be much slower :(

We have 8 users viewing 2 cameras each at the office - frame rate is 1
every
5 secs - which is ok for looking at the carpark etc., and when someone is
standing by the door.

I also have SurvellienceCam running at nighttime which record enough frames
to see what happens.

We dont use the servers HTML pages, just use a simple page on a local
server
with a reference to the jpeg stream

I can send you a sample page if you like, as i say 8 people viewing 2
camera's simultaneously everyday, and only reset the MV1000 about twice in
last couple of months.



Dean.


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian G. Reynolds [mailto:brian.g.reynolds@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 September 2003 18:28
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] MV1000 users


I am glad I am not the only one....

If I connect via VPN from work I can, eventually, see some of the cameras
but not all six at one time...I can not even do that at home!

The only way I have found to view any of the cameras is to go in using the
vc-admin account and change the dropdown box....often crashes but when you
log back into the thing the selected page is displayed...

Has anyone any thoughts of moving some/all of the hardware onto a faster
box? is it possible?

What about using the Mv1000 as a FTP server of some kind and viewing the
images another way? or am I talking utter bo***cks?

B.




-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Barrett [mailto:dean@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 September 2003 12:55
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] MV1000 users


That may be possible, I've tried from home behind a Vigor Router, Office
has a Vigor too.

Anyone else have any suggestions ??

I wonder if Zonealarm has an affect at home too...

Dean.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gale [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 September 2003 12:38
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] MV1000 users


Same problem.



Don't know if the java plugin uses an odd port? I have an ADSL
router/firewall installed so that may also be blocking ?

Paul.



-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Barrett [mailto:dean@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 September 2003 12:30
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] MV1000 users



Just restarted the server - can you try again ?



Dean.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gale [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 September 2003 12:12
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] MV1000 users


I get - 'contacting server' then 'request failed'



Yes - the MV1000 is VERY slow :-(



Maybe this was why they went 'ti*s up' ???

Paul.



-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Barrett [mailto:dean@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 September 2003 12:04
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] MV1000 users



If you've got your MV1000 plugin installed on your browser, can you look
here for me :-

http://rolec.dyndns.info/cctv/camera1.html
http://rolec.dyndns.info/cctv/camera2.html

Can you see anything ??

I've been trying to view these from home, but doesn't work - I think its
because its soooo slow the browser times out before installing plugin.

With about 8 users we're getting 1 frame every 10secs or so :)



Dean.



** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/








Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.