[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: draytek vigor "keep state" ?
On Friday 16 May 2003 13:40, Ant wrote:
> Changed the filter type from "block immediately" to
"block if no further
> match" and it all works. I guess the state table checking is an
implicit
> rule done after the filter sets.
Doh! Ignore that. The problem was in fact caused by me having half the
rules
in set#1, but starting processing at set#2.
I'll shut up now.
ant
--
/\/\
www.ant.org ('') www.ant.org
()
Megawatt Winged Avenger
** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|