[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: Cat5 cabling
Rob,
I'm sure there is a standard, but I didnt use it consciously. Looking at
the plugs so you can see the metal contacts on both plugs, I just wired the
4 colours from the phone plug parallel to the middle 4 of the RJ45. What I
am calling baluns is the top picture here: http://tinyurl.com/btkd This
company calls them tailed voice adaptors... We use them at work for the
structured cabling, which I assume was wired in to a cat5 standard, so my
'adaptor' working with these implies that (apart from the solid cores) was
to standard.
Matthew
----- Original Message -----
From: "sh33pdip" <rjl@xxxxxxx>
> Thanks Matthew, that's what I thought.
>
> Is there any standard for the configuration of the colours/pins (for
> the baluns)?
>
> Rob
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Matthew Norman" <mafiu@n...>
wrote:
> > I cut the bt phone plug off the end of an old phone and crimped a
> RJ45 on
> > the spare end. I used the 4 middle conductors of the rj45 and
> this was
> > compatible with the phone baluns (rj45 to phone socket) that I
had
> aquired.
> >
> > The phone wire core was not solid, and so should not technically
be
> > compatible with the rj45 IDC connectors, but its worked for about
> a year
> > now, apart from the time that I accidently patched my ethernet
> segment into
> > bt and the phones stopped working.....(!)
> >
> > Matthew
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|