The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Meteor Caller ID drivers ?


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Meteor Caller ID drivers ?
  • From: "mark_harrison_uk2" <mph@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 19:40:07 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Chris,

What is it you're trying to control/report on?

There are a whole bunch of schemas, some released, others under
development.

You may like to join the following groups:

- xap_automation for general discussion
- xAP_developer for developers

Regards,

Mark

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Chris McGookin" <chris@m...> wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> I've been wondering if there's a way I can convert the schema for
the
> Meteor to suit the other devices I have like the RS232 amp- would
the
> SDK let me then compile this?
> I've got a working knowledge of snmp schema and other scripts of
that
> sort of level but that's about as extensive as my programming skills
> get.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: patricklidstone [mailto:patrick@xxxxxxx...]
> Sent: 01 May 2003 12:37
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Meteor Caller ID drivers ?
>
>
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Nikola Kasic" <nikola@k...>
wrote:
> > Patrick,
> > You often refer to xAP and compare it with Autom8it.
> > I thought that xAP is just a protocol, not the application.
> > Or there is some application available that can handle xAP
messages?
> > Please enlighten me :-).
>
> At the base level, xAP is a protocol specification. The protocol
> specification is published in the public domain, but is copyright.
> Anyone is free, and indeed is encouraged, to implement applications
> or devices which comply with the protocol. The overall goal is to
> promote inter-operability between devices; you can think of it as
an
> esperanto for HA if you like.
>
> A number of people - myself included - have implemented SDKs
> (software development kits) which allow xAP compliant applications
to
> be built quickly and easily. The terms under which these are made
> available varies, but most, if not all, are free for non-commercial
> use.
>
> Then at the top level, built on the SDKs, there are a wide variety
of
> applications. These provide xAP connectivity for a given device or
> software application. Examples include: notification of new e-mail
> arriving; LCD display drivers; caller id interfaces and so on.
>
> Because xAP is fundamentally a broadcast protocol, any xAP
> device/application can potentially act on information broadcast by
> any other device/application. This gives a high level of
resilience -
> you don't *have* to rely on a central controller, and if the
central
> controller breaks, the system can degrade gracefully. (Having a
> central, or at least powerful, PC in the system does make sense for
> stuff like web serving, and they do have a place - I just don't
want
> to rely on them to ensure I get up in the morning!) The esperanto
> nature of xAP makes it very easy to add new devices/applications
> without having to spend ages reprogramming the rest of the system
to
> recognise that device: as often as not, the new device "just
works".
>
> Coming back to the central controller issue: Today, whether you use
> Autom8it, Homeseer or whatever, when you add a new device you rely
on
> a plugin being available to support that device. There is a huge
> amount of duplicate effort being expended - there are umpteen
meteor
> plug-ins for example - wouldn't be easier if there was
> one "universal" one which was enough? If these controllers
choose
to
> support xAP (as Mister House has done) they then have instant
access
> to all current and future xAP devices, with xAP providing a kind
> of "Universal plugin" architecture. For the end user that is
a
pretty
> compelling proposition... but it also levels the playing field
> somewhat for the authors of cental controller software, and I can
> understand why that is scary for them. Fortunately, most Win based
> controllers provide access to VB script - and embedding for an end-
> user to embed the xAP active X contol is, for the most part,
straight
> forward, so they don't have to rely on the controller developers
> providing integral support to leverage xAP... (Although I'm sure
> integral support will come with time -- and I'm looking forward to
> it :-)
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=247865.3003379.4507215.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17
05
> 041992:HM/A=1482387/R=0/*http://ads.x10.com/?
bHlhaG9vaG0xLmRhd=105178904
> 8%
3eM=247865.3003379.4507215.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705041992:HM/A=14823
> 87/R=1=1051789048%
3eM=247865.3003379.4507215.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050
> 41992:HM/A=1482387/R=2>
>
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
M=247865.3003379.4507215.1261774/D=egrou
> pmail/S=:HM/A=1482387/rand=765152953>
>
> ** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here:
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.