The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Its Quiet


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] Hard drive opinions?


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [OT] Hard drive opinions?
  • From: "Ian Willoughby" <ian@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:03:35 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx


I guess that is the clink I get on my 40GB WD, it sounds like Heads
parking, windows would hang on this drive but since I put it in my linux
machine it seems OK.

R's
Ian


-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Prior [mailto:bruno@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 30 April 2003 18:05
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Hard drive opinions?

Be careful of WD's bigger 7200rpm drives. I bought 4 Caviar 7200rpm
Special
Edition 120Gb drives for the software RAID on my home server. One disk
would
"fail" and drop out of the array every 24 hours or so, and a
second
would
"fail" around once a week, crashing the server if I didn't reboot
after
the
first failure (if I wanted to have to reboot that often, I'd be running
Windows ;-) ).

I put it down to overheating and stuck the disks in a Lian-Li case with
a
pair of fans blowing over the drive cage, but still had problems when
the
drives were no more than lukewarm to the touch. I sent back the disk
that failed every 24 hours and was sent the updated version as a
replacement. This reduced the "failure" frequency to once a week
per
disk,
but one or other would continue to "fail" with that frequency.

Someone eventually pointed me at this article on WD's support site:

http://wdc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wdc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_admin=
1&p_faqid=913&p_created=1047068027

In his opinion (and mine too), they are also having this problem with
their
120Gb drives. When they "fail", you hear a clunk, (which I take
to be
them
parking their heads before going to sleep), after which you get a series
of
IDE errors that all basically indicate that the disk suddenly decided
not to
respond. They work fine again as soon as you reboot, so it appears to be
not
so much a genuine failure, as a configuration glitch.

Interestingly, I moved them over from an Athlon/Via board to an Intel/P4
combination, and they haven't crashed since (but it's only been around
10
days). I understand from other problems I have had that Via chipsets can
have major DMA problems, so this may be connected or it may be
coincidence.
But for myself, I do not plan to buy either Via-based boards or WD hard
disks in the near future.

Cheers,

Bruno


Dave McLaughlin wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Watford have a 7200 rpm version for less than that on this page. I
guess
> the 5400 is more suited to the Tivo because of heat generation.
>
>
http://www.savastore.com/category.asp?catalog%5Fname=Savastore&category%
5Fname=Hard+Drive+%2D+IDE&Page=1&pid=1
>
>
> I would tend to favour Watford because of the recent problems I have
read
> about Ebuyer. I got mine next day for only 3.95 postage.
>
> Regards Dave... ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Gordon To:
> ukha_d@xxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:33 PM
Subject:
> [ukha_d] [OT] Hard drive opinions?
>
>
> Anyone have any opinions about this drive?....
>
>
http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products/index.html?action=c2hvd19wcm9kdW
N0X292ZXJ2aWV3&product_uid=32009
>
>
> TIA
>
> Paul G.
>
> PS, today is the LAST day of the free delivery offer on Ebuyer if
anyone
> is considering making any purchases in the near future....



** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.