Re: Fixed IP / IP ranges

["Shaf" <shaf@xxxxxxx>]

This is what I have at the moment.

<-- cable modem -> [ gw 1 ipv4 address 1 ipv6 address] ( Running
linux
NATing the below networks : Services SMTP, HTTP(multiple vhosts and
proxies),SSH, port forwarding to subnets and transparency for NAT'd hosts,
ipv6inv4)
<----cross over cable--> [ Wireless
Access Point ]<---> {Wireless Network }

<---- >{ cat5 wired network ipv4 and
ipv6 }

<-----> {IEEE1394 Network over several
ports}

I haven't played with a H.323 gateway but looking at the docs it runs on
linux (whoo hoo).

Shaf


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Willoughby" <ian@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Fixed IP / IP ranges


> Serving is not the only reason for having static IP's. I currently run
4
of my IP's (1 is an AP) on the external network for Wireless over VPN so
that they are treated as any other internet user but can have full
unrestricted internet access. I also run a H.323 gateway that needs a
static
IP, 1 NAT router plus 1 internet router, 2 email servers (1 for the family,
1 for a business venture) plus a home web server.
>
> An ADSL line gives a lot of people reasonable serving ability, not
that
long ago hosts were sharing T1's at best and some were on single
Kilostreams
(64K).
>
> R's
> Ian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shaf [mailto:shaf@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thu 10/07/2003 14:04
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Fixed IP / IP ranges
>
>
>
> Yeh well said.... and if I may add why the hell the need for a /29 (7
ips
@
> home on an adsl connection).
> You can't do any serious serving at home anyway. Come on folks there
aint
> that many ipv4 addresses around so this is just a waste.
>
> Even if you have a single dhcp address at home there is always DDNS
(dynamic
> DNS) to sort you out.
>
> I myself have a cable modem at home (blueyonder 1024k down 256k up)
dynamic
> address which doesnt really fluctuate and I'm content with it even
though
> I've got some hosts at home but the builk of my /28 /29 networks are
in
> datacentres where they belong.
>
> Roll on ipv6.
> Shaf
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mark_harrison_uk2" <mph@xxxxxxx>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:45 PM
> Subject: [ukha_d] Fixed IP / IP ranges
>
>
> > It's worth mentioning in all this "IP range frenzy",
that IANA, which
> > has overall responsibility for IP address allocation, and RIPE,
which
> > manages such things for IANA in Europe, _can_ take back IP
addresses.
> >
> > If you need a static IP address, please do ask your ISP for one.
> >
> > If you ask for, say, a block of 8, then it's fairly easy to put
> > forward a case for this, and easy to demonstrate that you need
them.
> >
> > If you ask for MORE than 8, then it's possible that you will, at
some
> > point, be asked to demonstrate the need. If you can't demonstrate
a
> > technical need, then they may be taken away, even if you have
paid
> > money for them.
> >
> > The RIPE form isn't complex, but it is long, and requires you to
> > provide current, and estimated requirements for clients and
servers.
> > If you are asking for a disproportionate number of IP addresses,
you
> > may be asked to demonstrate why NAT is not an option.
> >
> > For a block of 8, you are unlikely to be asked to fill in a RIPE
> > form, but may be asked by your ISP to show the need. In case it
> > helps, here was my justification for a block of 8, which does
> > demonstrate that I use DHCP and NAT where possible:
> >
> > - Router (IP required)
> > - Web Server (SSL required)
> > - Email Server (MX records required)
> > - Database Server (SSL required for remote admin)
> > - 3 * Workstations (DHCP with NAT)
> > - 3 * laptops (DHCP)
> > - 1 * Videoconferencing workstation (static IP required)
> > - 6 Network MP3 players (DHCP - no internet access required)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.
> >
> > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>