[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gigabit LANs - Overkill for home?
Mark,
I'm thinking of upgrading also but don't really think I'll get any
performance gains for my main network it'll just be machines that are 64bit
or machines.
Currently I have a kick ass netgear switch which gives me practical
transfer
rates of 80mbps ie a 700-800meg file can be transfered over the network
between machines in about a minute.
If I was to upgrade I would be limited by the the speed of my disks and CPU
architecture. The current bottle neck are these....
Local speeds are :
root gw:~> hdparm -tT /dev/hdd
/dev/hdd:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.63 seconds =203.17 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.70 seconds = 37.65 MB/sec
So if I upgrade the network at best and if I'm lucky I'll recogn I get
twice
as fast network speed and thats it.
Best and cheapest upgrade route I found was going with netgear..... 4 port
switch 200 squid + NICS @ 30 squid a piece but I'd use this for clustering
or interconnecting servers only.
Shaf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hawes,Timothy Edward (GEG)" <haweste@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 7:44 AM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Gigabit LANs - Overkill for home?
Mark,
Not personally running one but the Dell Optiplexes I buy at work have
*onboard* 10/100/1000 LAN as standard. I guess it's one of those things
that
once you have it, you can't live without it :-)
Tim H.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark McCall
Just noticed a Gigabit NIC on eBuyer for around £50 inc VAT
http://tinyurl.com/iw93
Anyone running Gigabit LANs at home yet? If so is it an ego thing :) Or
is
it genuinely needed?
M.
+
** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|