[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Fw: Satellite Broadband and Citrix
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Fw: Satellite Broadband and Citrix
- From: Gareth Cook <g@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:54:54 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Anything that requires a lot of ACKs is really going to struggle with high
latency satellite connections - raw downloads with a download manager
speed along nicely. Sure that a leased line or ISDN 24hr link would not be
better ?
G.
Gareth Cook
BTPM North Region
IBM SWG - BTE Office - Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
Office: +44 (0)1784 445166 - Mobile: +44 (0)7980 445166
AIM Chat : TheBoyG - MSN Chat : chat@xxxxxxx
email: g@xxxxxxx
----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 28/04/2003 12:53 -----
Discussion
Main Topic
"mark_harrison_uk2" <mph@xxxxxxx>
Today 12:47
.
Subject:
.
[ukha_d] Satellite Broadband and Citrix
.
Category:
Hi all,
A friend of mine has just discovered that she's too far from the
exchange to get ADSL, so that scuppers that plan :-(
Trying to work out whether there _are_ any decent alternatives, and
wondering whether satellite is an option.
Here's the monkey - a lot of what she uses her 'net connection for is
talking to an NFuse/Citrix server, so lots of low latency
applications.
Any comments on whether that's viable with satellite, and how much
the different options cost?
Regards,
Mark
** UKHA2003 BE THERE! Details here:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/article.php3?story_id=1110
**
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|