[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Echo on the phone line
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Echo on the phone line
- From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:43:41 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I dont see why he needed to run 2 cables.
When I had HH I had a single 4 pair telephone cable with the line coming in
on Brown/White pair and the analogue 1 connected to Blue/White and
Orange/White pairs
The cable supplied with the HH box is a 3 pair cable about 25m long and
uses
the Green/White pair for the line and Blue and Orange pairs for Analogue
1.
The digital part of HH ie the incoming line would not be affected by the
analogue port, likewise, the digial signal should not cause any inteference
on analogue wiring otherwise there would be no chance of getting HH to work
over a cable carrying hundreds of lines for several miles from the exchange
to your house !!!
Keith
www.diyha.co.uk
www.kat5.tv
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Smith [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 28 April 2003 10:41
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Echo on the phone line
>
>
> Do you mean the HomeHighway NTE and BT master socket for the
> HH line - or do
> you have 2 diff physical lines ?
>
> When the BT engineer installed my HH (in the loft @ Node 0)
> he ran 2 cables
> from the existing master socket (whcih became an extension).
>
> One for the Master phone line cable going to the Master socket.
> One back to the old master to feed it as an extension.
>
> I asked why he couldn't use spare pairs in the first cable
> for the extension
> and he reckoned he'd had problems doing it that way and it
> was safer to use
> seperate cabling.
>
> Cant remember the specific problems he mentioned but I'm susre it was
> something like interference/cross-talk/echo. Pretty sure the
> cable he used
> was shielded as well. Maybe an issue with using unshielded cat 5 ?
>
> Deano
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|