[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Pace Twinview - First Impressions
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Pace Twinview - First Impressions
- From: "Kenneth Watt" <kwatt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:27:37 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> I think this quality issue may be a bit of a red herring - AIUI the
box
> records the mpeg stream straight to disk - effectively an exact
digital
> copy
> of the transmission so there should be no difference at all between
off
> air
> and recorded .
That's not what I meant Kevin, the actual recordings I have to admit after
a
bit more looking last night are excellent, but it wasn't that I was
commenting on, just the general picture quality from the box off-air. What
I
was saying was that there is no option to lower the bitrate and allow for
greater overall recording time.
The reason being that, for some people like SWMBO, picture quality isn't
the
be all and end all to her for soaps and the high bitrate obviously used
here, to be frank, is wasted on her/the crap she watches and it would have
been better to see an option to lower it and allow a greater library of
recordings.
K.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|