[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: [notspam] Length of patch cables for CAT5
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [notspam] Length of patch cables for CAT5
- From: "mark_harrison_uk2" <mph@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 08:30:49 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
It's what's known in IT circles as a "typo" :-)
I'm pretty sure what I meant was "can't detect split pairs for cables
under 3'"
Sorry.
M.
--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "David Yeend" <david.yeend@c...>
wrote:
> Sorry to be ignorant..... but what is a split under?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark_harrison_uk2 [mailto:mph@xxxxxxx...]
> Sent: 02 April 2003 19:43
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [notspam] [ukha_d] Length of patch cables for CAT5
>
>
> Mick,
>
> According to the O'Reilly book, there isn't a minimum.
>
> However, quite a lot of cable detectors can't detect split unders
for
> cables under 3'.
>
> Personally, I stick with a minimum of 50cm.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Mick Furlong"
<hiltoneltd@y...>
wrote:
> > Chad
> >
> > I am asking about minimum lengths not maximum
> >
> > Thanks
> > Mick
>
>
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|