The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: IR Distribution ( What Cable )


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Electricity Bill


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Electricity Bill
  • From: "Dr John Tankard" <john@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:56:19 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

>
> My server has a 150W PSU, so that's the most it'll ever
> consume.  So over a year, it can only ever consume 0.15x8760
> =3D 1314kwh.  That works out at =A352.56 at 4p/kwh, to =A378.84 a= t
> 6p/kwh which is what my electricity runs at. That's at full
> tilt too!  The processor is actually rated at under 10W at
> full tilt, so if I removed all the extraneous pieces, such as
> extra HDDs, CD-RW, CD-ROM, etc. I could probably save half
> that.  Bearing in mind that my machine is idle most of the
> time, I doubt it costs more than =A350/year.
>
> If I were to base the same calculations on my 250w PSU in the
> Athlon 600, things would be a lot different (=A387.60 -
> =A3131.40).  There's a reason my main server is a P200!

Mine is a 1.5 G with a 350w psu its atcualy using 518 w, two reasons the PSU's are usualy quoted as power output, not input, the input will me
more and in my rack there is a 240v fan to cool the hard disk array

John



http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.