|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: 240v LED |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: ot WOW what a phone
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: ot WOW what a phone
- From: "Gerard McGovern" <stuff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:21:12 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> I=92ve actually spent a day with a 7650, and the size when
> collapsed is fine, the software is vastly superior to
> anything that Ericsson or Motorola ever have or will produce.
>
> Why do you always have to get so aggressive? Reminds me of
> the firewire/USB 2.0 argument. Don=92t be so effin=92 dogmatic.
> The arrogance of youff I suppose.
Oh I give up. As soon as I disagree with a 'regular' I'm classed as
being aggressive. Get a life. Not everyone here kisses the asses of
moderators/regulars and agrees with everything they say. Apart from
this
email here which is clearly aggressive, how have any of previous emails
on this subject been anywhere near aggressive?
Also, "arrogance of youff"? What if I were to say 'ignorance of
t=
he
disabled' or 'stupidity of Germans'? Don't be so rude and narrow-minded
as to dismiss someone's views because of the group they belong to. It's
not big and it certainly isn't clever.
The 7650 runs a Symbian OS which, surprise surprise, will also be
present on the Sony Ericsson P800. For you to say that Nokia have
produced something that is "vastly superior to anything that Ericsson
=
or
Motorola ever have or will produce" is laughable. Not only did Nokia
N=
OT
produce the software entirely that same software will be available on
the Sony Ericsson!
Have you actually seen the image quality of the 7650? It is useless and
your example users surveyors, estate agents and architects would have a
really time getting anything useful from it. Here is an example:
http://www.joel.co.uk/=
nokia/lowlight.jpg
Also, your example of teenagers is also laughable. In a year's time
when
phones with cameras are cheap then yes, they will use it. But only rich
teenagers can afford a phone that is =A3450 offline.
The Nokia 7650 is a great concept with crap execution, but you expect
that with a 'first' in technology. Once they become smaller and the
image quality is better than that will be great. But as it stands the
phone is about as much use as a chocolate teapot.
What's the point anyway? I'm probably going to be banned for daring to
disagree with Timothy. Meh. See you later boys and girls.
G
--
=BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA
Gerard McGovern
w: http://www.inkiboo=
.com
m: +44 7980 760 228
aim: inkiboouk y!: inkiboo msn: gerard@xxxxxxx
"imagination is more important than
knowledge"=
Yahoo! Groups
Spons=
or |
ADVERTISEMENT =
|
|
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=
a>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|