The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Magazines...


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: ot WOW what a phone


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: ot WOW what a phone
  • From: "Gerard McGovern" <stuff@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:21:12 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

> I=92ve actually spent a day with a 7650, and the size when
> collapsed is fine, the software is vastly superior to
> anything that Ericsson or Motorola ever have or will produce.
>
> Why do you always have to get so aggressive? Reminds me of
> the firewire/USB 2.0 argument. Don=92t be so effin=92 dogmatic.
> The arrogance of youff I suppose.

Oh I give up. As soon as I disagree with a 'regular' I'm classed as
being aggressive. Get a life. Not everyone here kisses the asses of
moderators/regulars and agrees with everything they say. Apart from this email here which is clearly aggressive, how have any of previous emails
on this subject been anywhere near aggressive?

Also, "arrogance of youff"? What if I were to say 'ignorance of t= he
disabled' or 'stupidity of Germans'? Don't be so rude and narrow-minded
as to dismiss someone's views because of the group they belong to. It's
not big and it certainly isn't clever.

The 7650 runs a Symbian OS which, surprise surprise, will also be
present on the Sony Ericsson P800. For you to say that Nokia have
produced something that is "vastly superior to anything that Ericsson = or
Motorola ever have or will produce" is laughable. Not only did Nokia N= OT
produce the software entirely that same software will be available on
the Sony Ericsson!

Have you actually seen the image quality of the 7650? It is useless and
your example users surveyors, estate agents and architects would have a
really time getting anything useful from it. Here is an example:

http://www.joel.co.uk/= nokia/lowlight.jpg

Also, your example of teenagers is also laughable. In a year's time when phones with cameras are cheap then yes, they will use it. But only rich
teenagers can afford a phone that is =A3450 offline.

The Nokia 7650 is a great concept with crap execution, but you expect
that with a 'first' in technology. Once they become smaller and the
image quality is better than that will be great. But as it stands the
phone is about as much use as a chocolate teapot.

What's the point anyway? I'm probably going to be banned for daring to
disagree with Timothy. Meh. See you later boys and girls.

G

--

  =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA =95 =BA
  Gerard McGovern

    w: http://www.inkiboo= .com
    m: +44 7980 760 228

    aim: inkiboouk y!: inkiboo msn: gerard@xxxxxxx
    "imagination is more important than knowledge"=



Yahoo! Groups Spons= or
ADVERTISEMENT
=

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.