|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Homeseer etc vs Homevision
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Homeseer etc vs Homevision
- From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:12:19 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Much as I love PCs they're.... PCs...... HV is a dedicated
hardware
> solution.
Quite, I don't trust PCs enough to let it control critical systems,
like
heating!
> > 4. I would like to use speech synthesis
(texttospeech stuff)
>
> HS can certainly do that, no idea about HV.... but if Ken says it
can
be
> done with a PC, no probs :)
Yup, you need...HV, PC, TTS module of some description (software) and
you're off.
> I set up voice control with HS..... because it was possible, I did
it.
> OK I was running a P233 at the time, which probably didn't help,
but
> using a crappy desktop microphone with a long extension lead to my
main
> seating position, I *could* issue commands. Often it got them
wrong....
> don't know if it was the spec of the PC, the mic, the software, my
> commands, or my pronounciation and training. Fun to mess around
with
one
> weekend, possibly keep it running in the background for
geek-factor
> demos. To do it seriously, with open air mics and filters etc.....
mega
> bucks.
This would appear to be the major stumbling block for speech
recognition
as everyone that has used it or installed it, seems to think that it is
somewhat useful, but not all that you may think. TTS is far more useful
for feedback.
> When I had it, I couldn't really think of much I wanted to do with
> it...... generally used the Pronto instead.... it gets things
right
when
> I ask it!
Hence the comment above! I looked at speech recognition a while back
and
was advised against it as, given the cost, flakiness and the hassles of
installing it, it just wasn't worth it. The Pronto is *the* interface
of
choice for me as it is 100% reliable with IR back to HV.
> To some degree, yes, not totally sure which ones, but its the fact
that
> you need to figure out which ones, figure out which ones clash
with
> other ones, make sure you have enough ports in the pc, make sure
you
had
> the right drivers, make sure the video card / sound card/
operating
> system etc you have doesn't clash with X, Y or Z..... which leads
to
> hassle and flakiness, and probably in the long run, a greater
expense!
That's the thing, all the PC stuff seems tailored to each user of it
all
so you only buy what you need, when you need it. The trick I think here
is to decided what the end game is and make a decision based on that
rather than rush in and two weeks later start with the "I wish
I'd..."!
;)
For my money and IMHO, for HA using X10 HV is the dog's danglies and it
cannot be disputed that it is flexible and expandable as well as easy
to
program (I can even do it for God's sake! :D) and it can be interfaced
with a plethora of systems with *reasonable* ease. The other factor is
that after two years of HV near enough it has been 100% reliable and
stable, there aren't many PCs around that can match that. ;)
The choice of software for TTS etc comes down to what you need to do
and
there are choices, like Home Automator, Homeseer and ACE. It's a case
of
what suits you for your needs there but at least there is a choice!
> Buy HV, you know you want to!
Seconded! :)
K.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
|
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|