The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_=5Bukha=5Fd=5D_Re:_Joggler_back_at_=C2=A350?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: I was petrol bombed last night ... security ques tions


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: I was petrol bombed last night ... security ques tions
  • From: "Brian G. Reynolds" <brian.g.reynolds@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:41:00 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Hi, I have been looking at these on the web and yesterday I rang them to as= k a few questions, they did not seem that helpful which was a shame if I am= going to spend that amount with them.

One question I had was does this card interfere with Terminal Services in a= ny way, they said "it should not" well that is what ATI said abou= t their AIW cards till I forked out =A3250 on one to find TS does not work = with the ATI program! which is why I am now looking to change my whole syst= em....

As I understand these cards, they use BNC connectors, are these the same BN= C connectors that the old network system used to use? if so I assume you ca= n use CT100 or Ethernet cable?

What I was going to do was cut these connectors off and connect RJ45's to t= he cables but I am now thinking of hard wiring the cameras straight to N0. = as most of my cameras will be permanently situated anyway.

Have you tried any of the 307 cameras on Henry's?

Thanks,

B.



-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Cundall (Groups) [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 October 2002 17:36
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: I was petrol bombed last night ... security
ques tions


I have the 8 camera system with EXCELLENT cameras and it is a good system,<= BR> i.e. I watched my postman deliver my mail this morning from work.

It can record 100 fps at any one time and you can place priority on which camera it is recording i.e. Front door over say path leading upto the
camera.

With regards to a PC being on 24/7 so what?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dr John Tankard [mailto:john@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 October 2002 14:41
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: I was petrol bombed last night ... security
ques tions


> > http://www.= henrys.co.uk/cctv/multicam.htm
> >
> > A customer of mine has this system, but it was let down buy poor<= BR> > > cameras. The picture quality was so bad I could only
> recognise myself
> > by the colour of my shirt. He had positioned the cameras
> out of reach
> > and the image quality was as bad as some you see on crimewatch. > >
> >
> > John
> >
>
> John - is it a viable system with decent cameras, or is the
> system generally poor ?

Don't know, he is swapping the cameras but I don't think its been done
yet.

One thing to consider is do you want a PC on all the time for this task
or would you be better with one of the hardware systems that others have talked about, I have seen the Axis, and it was impressive but as has
been said before its expensive.

John

Yahoo! Groups Spons= or
ADVERTISEMENT
3D""

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.