|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_=5Bukha=5Fd=5D_Re:_Joggler_back_at_=C2=A350?= |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: I was petrol bombed last night ... security ques tions
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: I was petrol bombed last night ... security
ques tions
- From: "Brian G. Reynolds" <brian.g.reynolds@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:41:00 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Hi, I have been looking at these on the web and yesterday I rang them to
as=
k a few questions, they did not seem that helpful which was a shame if I
am=
going to spend that amount with them.
One question I had was does this card interfere with Terminal Services in
a=
ny way, they said "it should not" well that is what ATI said
abou=
t their AIW cards till I forked out =A3250 on one to find TS does not work
=
with the ATI program! which is why I am now looking to change my whole
syst=
em....
As I understand these cards, they use BNC connectors, are these the same
BN=
C connectors that the old network system used to use? if so I assume you
ca=
n use CT100 or Ethernet cable?
What I was going to do was cut these connectors off and connect RJ45's to
t=
he cables but I am now thinking of hard wiring the cameras straight to N0.
=
as most of my cameras will be permanently situated anyway.
Have you tried any of the 307 cameras on Henry's?
Thanks,
B.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Cundall (Groups) [mailto:groups@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 October 2002 17:36
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: I was petrol bombed last night ... security
ques tions
I have the 8 camera system with EXCELLENT cameras and it is a good
system,<=
BR>
i.e. I watched my postman deliver my mail this morning from work.
It can record 100 fps at any one time and you can place priority on
which
camera it is recording i.e. Front door over say path leading upto the
camera.
With regards to a PC being on 24/7 so what?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr John Tankard [mailto:john@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 October 2002 14:41
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: I was petrol bombed last night ... security
ques tions
> > http://www.=
henrys.co.uk/cctv/multicam.htm
> >
> > A customer of mine has this system, but it was let down buy
poor<=
BR>
> > cameras. The picture quality was so bad I could only
> recognise myself
> > by the colour of my shirt. He had positioned the cameras
> out of reach
> > and the image quality was as bad as some you see on
crimewatch.
> >
> >
> > John
> >
>
> John - is it a viable system with decent cameras, or is the
> system generally poor ?
Don't know, he is swapping the cameras but I don't think its been done
yet.
One thing to consider is do you want a PC on all the time for this task
or would you be better with one of the hardware systems that others
have
talked about, I have seen the Axis, and it was impressive but as has
been said before its expensive.
John
Yahoo! Groups
Spons=
or |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=
a>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|