This one from Maplins (LL Sat Cable
Code: XS46A Guide Price: =A30.99 ) has this attenuation:
Overall dia.: 7=B78mm
Nom. conductor area: 1=B725mm=3D
Nominal impedance: 75Ohms.
Attenuation per 100m: 4=B79dB at 100MHz
18=B774dB at 1000MHz
Which makes it better then CT100 and CT125 at 100MHz and between two of
the=
m
at 1000MHz.
Should it be fine then?
I am worried about bending CT125 as someone mentioned. I need one right
angle bending in the corner, behind skirting.
Is attenuation all that matters, and which frequencies are more
important
for TV signal, lower or higher?
What are the frequencies of Ch04-Ch80 (I think something like that is a
range on TV)
Cheers,
Nik
-----Original Message-----
From: Stainton-James, Mark (London) [mailto:stainmar@xxxxxxx.=
com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 11:20
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] extending aerial cable...
Mike Huggins has some information on the different cable
attenuation=
at:
-----Original Message-----
From: James Winspear [mailto:james.winspear@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 06 November 2002 11:12
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] extending aerial cable...
I used CT125 grade aerial cable which apparently is the best,
and
typically used for satellite TV installations, although some
people<=
BR>
suggest that CT100 grade cable is sufficient. Bought a reel
of=
25m from
a local electrical trade supplier for about =A330 (can't really
reme=
mber).
James
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use
this contact form
. Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control
over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed
to the relevant mailing list.