The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: WAY OT : Wedding Planner


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: BTInternet does it again !!!



Lee,

Good points, however...

BT is not quite like the other telcos, in that it inherited (from the taxpayer) a large asset base in the local loop.

While the flotation raised a significant sum for the public purse, it was, nonetheless, cheap compared to the installation cost of installing a nationwide local loop.

The "quid pro quo" for the shareholders receiving this "freeby" from the UK public, was twofold:

- firstly, that the UK public should receive a "fairly priced" service
- secondly, that BT should open up its infrastructure to competition

Now, on the first, I actually believe that BT has done a good job. Phone usage prices (in real terms, let alone compared to average incomes) have fallen tremendously.

On the second, however, BT have steadfastly tried to block competition, in some cases illegally (see the Oftel site), and overall put barriers into the path of firstly, any domestic Internet usage, and secondly Broadband Internet usage. Compare rates in the US to those here... and _those_ companies had to pay for their own infrastructure!

Regards,

Mark




-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Varga [mailto:lee@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 May 2002 23:28
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] BTInternet does it again !!!


>I am not getting into a discussion about whether people should leave
>their PCs connected for more than 12 hours a day or whatever but it is
>the very use of "To make things fairer for everybody, we've changed the
>daily internet use limit for Anytime and SurfTime  customers from 16
>hours to 12 hours of 'unmetered' access in any 24-hour period." ... It
>almost screams "We make money until you use more than 12 hours a day and
>so we'll allow you to use phone time until that point and if you use
>less then we're laughing."

I don't want to start an arguement here but...

<dons asbestos suit>
I'm not defending BT for 1 second, but let's be realistic here, the
telephone voice network is meant for voice calls that (generally) don't last
too long.

There are a finite (and generally very small) number of sockets at each
exchange, and if all the unmetered crowd are using the sockets 24x7 then the
1p/min crowd will never get a look-in.

Contrary to what most people believe, the internet is not 'free'. BT have to
pay for the fat pipes to carry your data up/down the country and over to
Europe and the US. This does not come cheap, and must be paid for ultimately
by the endusers.

BT are a company, and like all conpanies, are there solely to generate
profit for shareholders.
If BT offered unlimited voice calls for ?12/month it wouldn't be in business
for long.

When everyone paid 1p/min, the ISP and BT and Colt/Energis/etc. would all
making a profit.
I regularly paid ?70/month in internet call charges alone, and I was a
lightweight, I had friends who paid ?150+/month for net access.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the profit margin from ?20-?30
(never mind ?70-?150) is a serious step down, and BT (and most other telcos)
have huge debt mountains to sort out.

Ultimately, unmetered access is just that, access that is not metered by the
second like a standard voice call. If people used net access like they did
when it was 1p/min then it would still be ?9.99/month. but there are an
increasing number of the ?12/month crowd who are downloading P2P/newsgroup
warez by the gigabyte 24x7 with their PCs on autopilot, this a pushed the
backbone bandwidth required thru the roof, which costs, so something has got
to give. Hence the reducing number of hours.
If you're complaining 12 hours isn't enough, would it be fair to said you're
one of ones causing the problem?

Spreading even more doom and gloom, I can see this going in the other
direction too, to the ADSL crowd.
I can see BT/Ignite starting to impose quantity limits, just like in the US
and Oz. Where you may have a 512K line, but you're only allow to download
(for example) 5GB/month. Anymore and you are charged by the GB. May not be a
problem, for most, but downloading movie trailers @ 20MB a pop and listening
to internet radio stations and it all soon goes...

Oh, the joy of being in the digital age... :

<climbs out of hot asbestos suit>









For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Click Here!

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.