RE: CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----

["Martin" <ukha@xxxxxxx>]

Scarey monsters  !!!!!

Oh shit were all gonna die ...........



-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 March 2002 21:58
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----


Hmmm

I have one thing to add to the CAT-5 vs Wireless debate: Cancer and
Leukemia.

I'm amazed that people have so little problems with throwing 2.4Ghz
around
the house.
That's *MICROWAVES* for goodness sakes. Inverse Square Law and all
that???

Microwave repeaters on hillsides don't give you a personal high dosage,
because of the large distances involved, but surely, the sheer dosage
involved in continuous exposure to 90mw levels of 2,4Ghz radiation must
be a
cause for concern?

I mean, the 1800Mhz band of cellphones are already under suspicion, and
that's well below the resonant frequncy of water (2.6Ghz IIRC)

I shudder at the very thought of a Bluetooth headset. I mean, why not
just
*eat* some radium and be done with!

Anyways, returning to your usual, non-paranoid program ...

With one last word: Watch this space. I guarantee a Wireless Networking
related health scare, complete with thousands of victims, within ten
years.

Ian.





For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/