[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: CAT5 vs. Wire ---- LESS ----
- From: "Ian Lowe" <ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:58:05 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Hmmm
I have one thing to add to the CAT-5 vs Wireless debate: Cancer and
Leukemia.
I'm amazed that people have so little problems with throwing 2.4Ghz around
the house.
That's *MICROWAVES* for goodness sakes. Inverse Square Law and all that???
Microwave repeaters on hillsides don't give you a personal high dosage,
because of the large distances involved, but surely, the sheer dosage
involved in continuous exposure to 90mw levels of 2,4Ghz radiation must be
a
cause for concern?
I mean, the 1800Mhz band of cellphones are already under suspicion, and
that's well below the resonant frequncy of water (2.6Ghz IIRC)
I shudder at the very thought of a Bluetooth headset. I mean, why not just
*eat* some radium and be done with!
Anyways, returning to your usual, non-paranoid program ...
With one last word: Watch this space. I guarantee a Wireless Networking
related health scare, complete with thousands of victims, within ten years.
Ian.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|