RE: Re: SAD GIT (was - Re: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5)

["Mick Furlong" <hiltoneltd@xxxxxxx>]

Sorry Jon you forgot one......

 

OT = Obvious Twaddle

 

mick ;)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Whiten [mailto:jon@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 March 2002 18:01
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: SAD GIT (was - Re: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5)

To save confusion when writing the subject line I propose the following
convention to be employed in identifying On- and Off- Topic messages:-

OT      =      Off-topic
OT      =      On-topic

This will prevent any embarrassment caused by people failing to identify the
subject correctly.  Shall we put it to the vote?  ;oj


Regards,

Jon
http://www.whiten.co.uk/



> -----Original Message-----
> From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 18 March 2002 16:55
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: SAD GIT (was - Re: RGB to SVideo vs KAT5)
>
> <SNIP>
> >
> > I suppose I could have added OT as a prefix, but I just can't
> > tell what is
> > OT anymore anyway :-)
>
> Well when there is a dearth of T's as there is today, surely all OT stuff
> becomes T due to the lack of T content? :)
>
<SNIP>


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.