The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Web control of DDARs


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: OT: Which AV Amp?


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: OT: Which AV Amp?
  • From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:54:11 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Watt [mailto:kennwatt@xxxxxxx]
Sent:
07 March 2002 09:52
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT: Which AV Amp?

 

Subjective statement!

 

Yes, I don't disagree - for the money its very good, and it does the job - what I would argue though is that my opinion is Objective, and yours is subjective :) As you said - it does the job, and unless you're using it with a quadscan, 10 foot screen and spending the entire day looking at "Skyguide" the limitations won't be obvious. There is a minor delay issue on the luminance side (of the order of a few microseconds) which I've edited out through the service menu of my panel. All tellys are different though, and this delay was put in there for compatibility with the vast majority.

 

I'd give it eight out of ten

 

Tim

 

 


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.