The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: DVD to iPad Software


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BIK Proximity sensor progress



Correct it is the same value.

RS and Farnell do lots of different 100nF ceramic caps. What pitch, which
dielectric and voltage etc are you after.

Dave..

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian B" <Ian@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] BIK Proximity sensor progress


> Is this the cap more commonly known as 100nF? If so I have plenty but I
> think the original boards have slightly better spec ones than the cheapy
> versions I have. I will check it out.
>
> In the mean time can someone please confirm that .1uF = 100nF.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ian B (still to get the hang of capacitor values)
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Stuart Grimshaw [mailto:stuart@xxxxxxx]
> >Sent: 04 June 2002 14:42
> >To: UKHA Group
> >Subject: [ukha_d] BIK Proximity sensor progress
> >
> >
> >...or lack of.
> >
> >The project is prevented from being complete by the fact that the
> >most common
> >component on the board seems to be unavailable :-(
> >
> >I'm emailing to see if anyone can suggest a replacement (and
> >perhaps donate
> >some to finish the project?)
> >
> >The part is a "0.1uF ceramic disc" capacitor, and the board requires 11
of
> >them.



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.