Re: RG6 and Speaker cable

["happy_hammer66" <bill.mcmahon@xxxxxxx>]

Yes replying to my own mail, looked in the archive's and found an 
interesting RG6/CT100 discussion related to NTL. It seems that whilst 
CT100 was better quality, the RG6 was supposed to allowed better bi-
directional comms. I take it this means that it has better upstream 
(5-65 Mhz) characteristics/noise immunity? However other sites say 
that RG6 is for terrestial/analogue satellite and CT100 was for 
Digital satellite. Still, would appreciate any uptodate 
recommendation. 

bill

--- In ukha_d@y..., "happy_hammer66" <bill.mcmahon@t...>
wrote:
> My builder is putting in RG6 cable for the satellite/TV and some 
sort 
> of shielded twisted pair for the speakers. I had requested CT100 
for 
> the TV and possibly 79-strand for the speakers. Should i tell him 
to 
> stop and replace them or are these OK?
> 
> bill

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.