|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RF interference
> I said that as an example. If your picture goes from good to
> pants just by
> routing thru the TiVo this sounds exactly like a taboo
> channel problem. The
> fact that you've tried 21 and 69 is meaningless unless you
> know all the
> channels you are receiving and place TiVo on a non taboo one.
I don't see that it is meaningless.
Let's say I stick tivo in and it affects one channel - C5.
I move Tivo to channel 21 and C5 is still affected
I move Tivo to channel 69 and C5 is still affected
This, to me means that whether Tivo is modulating out to 21 OR to 69,
the
interference is still there and thus the Tivo channel is _not_ the
problem
because I have used two widely separated channels with still the same
effect.
Without Tivo, the TV is presented with N RF channels.
Add in Tivo and it should be N+1 RF channels - ie just the addition of
the
Tivo channel.
Or are you suggesting that Tivo is remodulating ALL incoming channels
to
different channels so I have 2 x N channels + 1 for the Tivo output of
recorded material?
Tony
********************************************************************
Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
********************************************************************
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|