The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Combining X10 powerline interfaces


  • To: UKHA Group <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Combining X10 powerline interfaces
  • From: "K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 12:41:43 +0100 (BST)
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Kevin Hawkins wrote:

>     Anyone think this is a worthwhile project and how many local interfaces
> would you think makes sense ?

It would be a challenging project to design and implement. The X-10
two-way powerline interface is an elementary device that has little or no
intelligence built in. The sending device connected to the TW523/XM10U
needs to tell it exactly at what point in the mains sinewave to send the
120KHz signal in milliseconds and the duration. Likewise, the receiving
signal from the TW523/XM10U is raw TTL signal that follows the waveform of
the receiving X-10 signal. There is also the regular 50Hz (100Hz in
effect) zero-crossing pulses available.

The proposed device would have to emulate and provide the raw TTL signals
to interface with all the attached equipment that are designed to work
with TW523/XM10U in real-time and simultaneously. Presumably, the proposed
device would also have to resolve collision problems between connected
equipment.

Regards,

Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.