The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Telephone hardware re-direction


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Plasma pixels


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Plasma pixels
  • From: "Phillip Harris" <phil@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:59:44 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Title: Message
Last time I looked at the Pioneer 50" it had horrendous problems with reds flaring!
 
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Coates [mailto:ecolume@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 June 2002 13:51
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ukha_d] Plasma pixels

Tim,
 
I agree.  The LG screen didn't seem like a plasma.  It looked more like a rear projector screen.  The Panasonic is truly amazing!  The contrast ratio is massive and colour reproduction is very true to life.  Is saw a Panasonic on demo with a DVD playing of a fish tank.  It looked real, almost 3D at times.
Seeing the LG pixel problem just got me thinking.
I've being considering the Pioneer 50".  With the way plasmas are dropping in price I'll probably wait a bit longer before I buy one.  I just need to choose the model so I can wire for it and make a housing for it.
 
Simon
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 23 June 2002 13:32
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Plasma pixels

The LG is horrible – buy a Panasonic from ivojo – no dead pixels and in a different class.

 

Tim.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Coates [mailto:ecolume@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 June 2002 13:00
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Plasma pixels

 

I'm planning on buying a plasma screen in the near future.  The other day I was looking at a LG plasma screen in Currys and noticed that three of the pixels weren't working.  It was very distracting to watch the screen - and would be extremely upsetting if it was a set that you'd just bought.  The tag on the screen stated that it was guaranteed for 99.99% pixel operation.  Now to the layperson 99.99% might seem just about perfect, but if the screen has 852x480x3 pixels and has 0.01% defective pixels then that's over 120 pixels not working - which would be impossible to watch yet within the manufacturers spec.

 

Does anyone know which manufacturer of plasma tubes has the most reliable manufacturing method/service life?  Or has anyone have experience of this?

 

I think that even 1 defective pixel would be too distracting for me.

 

Thanks

 

Simon


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.