|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: CCTV DVRs |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Fw: Re: (OT) Kodak & TS
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Fw: Re: (OT) Kodak & TS
- From: "Gareth Cook" <gcook@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:04:08 +0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
And mine.
G.
| Gareth Cook
Senior Engineering Specialist
EMEA ED, IBM SWG
Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
|
Office: +44 (0) 1784 445
166
Mobile: +44 (0) 7980 445 166
Fax: +44 (0) 1784 499 166
|
|
----- Forwarded by Gareth
Cook/UK/IBM on 23/01/2002 16:05 -----
Discussion
Main Topic
"happy_hammer66"
<bill.mcmahon@xxxxxxx>
Today 16:01
| .
Subject:
.
| [ukha_d] Re: (OT) Kodak &
TS
.
|
Category:
|
|
| |
|
My order was accepted on Monday morning Jan 7th!!!
bill
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@e...>
wrote:
> Erm... and in what way is this relevant?
>
> The "web page" showing the price is simply an advert. The
contact with
> Kodak was reviewed by their web site's commerce engine, and the
> "contractural paperwork" is the page and email that was your
"receipt"
> ;-)
>
> Mark Harrison
> Head of Systems, eKingfisher
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter.white@b... [mailto:peter.white@b...]
> Sent: 23 January 2002 15:24
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] (OT) Kodak & TS
>
>
> It's been a bit quiet on this, but I've just had another call
from my
> local
> TS....apparently Kodak are claiming the following:
>
> The incorrect price was posted to the site for a 12hr period on
24/12.
> This was
> promptly removed, however 'someone' copied the page and posted it
> elsewhere on
> the internet. This was not detected by Kodak until 4/1, at which
point
> they
> removed it.
>
> She could not say who the 'someone' was, or where the page was
being
> hosted
> (though evidently somewhere where Kodak are able to delete it!)
>
> I explained to TS that I know a bit about web sites, and this really
did
> not
> sound plausible, but she said that this advise had come from
> Hertfordshire TS,
> and that they would have taken reasonable steps to ensure the
> information is
> accurate. I'd like to know how, as I think the above statement
is
> complete
> bu11$hit.
>
> Anyway, she'd like to hear the outcome once it's been through the
small
> claims
> court.
>
> Pete
>
> PS Even more annoyingly, Royal Mail have lost the recorded letter I
sent
> Kodak,
> so now I've got battle with them as well as send another letter.
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@y...
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs
SkyScan
> service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service
working
> around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
>
________________________________________________________________________
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|