[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: IrDA Repeater / Pace NTL Box
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: IrDA Repeater / Pace NTL Box
- From: "paulgwa" <paulgwa@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:01:13 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Hi Stuart,
It was an assumption on my part, I work for one of the semi's
companies I mentioned in my post and the only time we talk to people
about IrDA for remote style applications they tend to want
bidirectional connections and use a Transceiver with a number of 5mm
IR LEDS to get a decent distance.
For Unidirectional applications IrDA is usually too expensive and
limited due to it's origins as a short distance point to point link.
Regards
Paul
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Stuart Whyte" <lists@f...> wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>
> Given that this is only for bidirectional remote control I assume
> they are only using the 115.2Kbps solutions.
>
> </SNIP>
>
> Is the remote bidirectional?? I say this cause the remote has no
means of
> receiver IR, only transmition.
>
> Stuart
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|