[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: IrDA Repeater / Pace NTL Box
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: IrDA Repeater / Pace NTL Box
- From: "u7412ay" <allan.smith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:58:28 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Although the standard remote control may not be bi-directional, NTL
offer you the option of a keyboard for those that want to use the e-
mail facility.. any chance that this would be, feeback for
confirmation of keys pressed??? only a thought...
Regards
Allan
--- In ukha_d@y..., "paulgwa" <paulgwa@y...> wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> It was an assumption on my part, I work for one of the semi's
> companies I mentioned in my post and the only time we talk to
people
> about IrDA for remote style applications they tend to want
> bidirectional connections and use a Transceiver with a number of
5mm
> IR LEDS to get a decent distance.
>
> For Unidirectional applications IrDA is usually too expensive and
> limited due to it's origins as a short distance point to point link.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul
>
> --- In ukha_d@y..., "Stuart Whyte" <lists@f...> wrote:
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > Given that this is only for bidirectional remote control I
assume
> > they are only using the 115.2Kbps solutions.
> >
> > </SNIP>
> >
> > Is the remote bidirectional?? I say this cause the remote has
no
> means of
> > receiver IR, only transmition.
> >
> > Stuart
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|