The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Single Board Computer


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Single Board Computer
  • From: "Mick Furlong" <hiltoneltd@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:32:33 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Pedro if you want it to be really quiet consider using a compact flash card
to hold your OS they are silent. You can fit win 95 on a 96mb card for
example and I believe Linux can be configured even smaller.

Mick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pedro de Oliveira [mailto:p.oliveira@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 11 January 2002 16:19
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Single Board Computer
>
>
> <SNIP>
>
> True, but I was thinking of a PC Chips board which has on-board TV-Out
and
> 5.1 surrond and a C3 processor which'll run fanless.
>
> Or just 128MB RAM and a tiny HDD for OS only to stream from the
> server, and
> have something smaller and quieter!
>
> </SNIP>
>
> Andy : Your above points are exactly the reason I want to go the SBC
route
> as apposed to the Rio.  Do you have a web site for the above spec
> SBC?? This
> sounds ideal for me if the price is right ;-)
>
> Cheers
> Pedro
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.